<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clear to Sell User Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.licensinghandbook.com/2009/06/29/clear-to-sell-user-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.licensinghandbook.com/2009/06/29/clear-to-sell-user-data/</link>
	<description>The companion site to the Software Licensing Handbook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.licensinghandbook.com/2009/06/29/clear-to-sell-user-data/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licensinghandbook.com/?p=1026#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Present or future tense shouldn&#039;t matter.  Neither would a claim that it was &quot;true at the time&quot;.  You can see for yourself about amendments, as I linked to the document.  Regardless, courts have already started tossing the particular option out the window.  So, I would say that this Privacy Policy is actually quite limiting.  It would, of course, take someone to challenge Clear&#039;s behavior to see what would really happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Present or future tense shouldn&#8217;t matter.  Neither would a claim that it was &#8220;true at the time&#8221;.  You can see for yourself about amendments, as I linked to the document.  Regardless, courts have already started tossing the particular option out the window.  So, I would say that this Privacy Policy is actually quite limiting.  It would, of course, take someone to challenge Clear&#8217;s behavior to see what would really happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randomjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.licensinghandbook.com/2009/06/29/clear-to-sell-user-data/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>randomjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licensinghandbook.com/?p=1026#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Actually, that 3.A is formulated in the present tense.  &quot;We do not sell.&quot;  Not &quot;we will not sell&quot; or &quot;we shall not sell.&quot;  They could just claim that it was a true statement at the time it was made.  Did they later reserve the right to amend the policy without notice?  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that 3.A is formulated in the present tense.  &#8220;We do not sell.&#8221;  Not &#8220;we will not sell&#8221; or &#8220;we shall not sell.&#8221;  They could just claim that it was a true statement at the time it was made.  Did they later reserve the right to amend the policy without notice?  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://www.licensinghandbook.com/2009/06/29/clear-to-sell-user-data/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licensinghandbook.com/?p=1026#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Presumably they&#039;ll sell the final remnants of the company to whoever wants to buy it (calling it a merger or what have you) and the data will just come along with that. Voila, no ToS violation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably they&#8217;ll sell the final remnants of the company to whoever wants to buy it (calling it a merger or what have you) and the data will just come along with that. Voila, no ToS violation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
