Cracking the EULA’s Shell
Wired Magazine has posted an article by Jennifer Granick regarding a few California cases (state and federal) where the judge has decided that the terms of the EULA aren’t as ironclad as they have been for the last 12 years. Generally speaking, the state court ruled that the terms of an EULA are generally procedurally unconscionable, meaning that they’re going to be seen as contracts of adhesion… and the federal court ruled that vendor’s can’t change the terms of an agreement without providing the customer with notice of the change (ie: simple continued use of a service doesn’t automatically mean you’re bound to the change). Jennifer does a great job of explaining the logic.
Given the title of the article, Courts Turn Against Abusive Clickwrap Contracts, it would appear that Wired is attempting to sensationalize just a little. The truth is that the courts’ rulings aren’t that surprising (even if they came from California, a state known to be a little “fringe” about their opinions). The courts are applying some general contract priciples to EULA’s… which vendors have been lucky enough to avoid for the last decade. It’s about time.
The Licensing Handbook Blog is the companion site to the Software Licensing Handbook. Covering licensing topics on a regular basis, Jeffrey Gordon attempts to offer advice, add humor and sometimes even a bit of wit to a practice that most people find abhorrent – namely, reading a contract from start to finish.
Comments
One Response to “Cracking the EULA’s Shell”
-
"an invaluable guide to one of the software’s industry’s most maddening and, at times, controversial topics..."
-Rick Chapman, Editor Soft*Letter
"I would endorse Jeff's book. It is so great I wish I wrote it myself!"
-Jim Geisman, Owner Marketshare, Inc. -
[...] in August, I wrote about Cracking the EULA’s shell. In that instance, a California court was headed down the path of declaring EULAs as contracts of [...]